FPC and Parks & Recs Merger- First Repercussions
Philadelphia Mountain Biking Association - Forums
*
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: FPC and Parks & Recs Merger- First Repercussions  (Read 541 times)
dirtmerchant
PMBA Moderator
Addict
*****
Posts: 989



View Profile
« on: November 25, 2008, 04:09:15 PM »
Fox Chase hospital grapples with park lovers over land, By VALERIE RUSS
Philadelphia Daily News

Jean Gavin walks her dog in a wooded area of Burholme Park graced with 300-year-old trees with roots like elephants' feet. Wrinkled, gray, sturdy and strong, the roots grip the ground of Northeast Philadelphia. Last week in the park, off Cottman Avenue, leaves of ruby-red and lemon-yellow, apple-green and tawny-brown rustled in the wind. Where the earth slopes to the headwaters of the Tookany, Tacony and Frankford creeks, green stones glittered with diamond-like bits of mica. "As kids, we used to think it was gold," said Fred Maurer, a member of the Fairmount Park Advisory Council who, as a child, played along the mica-speckled Wissahickon and Pennypack creek beds.

Gavin, 73, and Maurer, 74, are among a group waging a bitter battle to save Burholme Park from the adjacent Fox Chase Cancer Center, which plans to use nearly 20 acres for a new hospital and other structures that would be built over the next two decades. "They will take away the heart of the park," said Maurer, adding that he and Gavin consider themselves "protectors" of the park. The two retirees were sued by the cancer center last year when they appealed a zoning variance granted to the hospital to build a cancer-research pavilion on its own land. The hospital dropped its suit after City Council changed the hospital's zoning to make it easier to build the pavilion, now under construction. In the current battle, Fox Chase, a nationally recognized cancer-research and -treatment center based at Shelmire and Central avenues, already has won approval from Mayor Nutter, Council and a divided Fairmount Park Commission to lease 19.4 acres of the 63-acre park. The lease is for 80 years, with options to renew.

In exchange, Fox Chase would pay $12.25 million to the city, according to Amy Ginensky, an attorney for the cancer center.
Still, some neighborhood residents won't give up. They challenged the deal in Orphans Court, where Judge John W. Herron recently heard seven days of testimony and is expected to issue a ruling any day. Samuel Stretton, the attorney representing neighbors fighting the expansion, said he based his arguments on the Public Trust Doctrine, a legal principle that prohibits "selling parkland that is being actively used." Stretton said the doctrine should trump the city's argument of an "inalienable property right" to sell the park. And he warned: "A lease of 80 years is essentially a sale." Land was willed to city.

The case is in Orphans' Court because most of Burholme Park was willed to the city by Robert W. Ryerss in the 19th century to be "used forever" as a public park. The park was turned over to the city in 1905. His father, Joseph Waln Ryerss, a railroad tycoon, had built Ryerss Mansion in 1859 as a summer home. Part of Burholme Park, as well as the Ryerss Museum and Library, are on the National Register of Historic Places. Ginensky, the attorney for the cancer center, said it's not a question of making a Solomon-type choice between the park and the hospital. "I think the way the city has done this, . . . the park still survives and the cancer institute survives," Ginensky said.

But at least one Fairmount Park commissioner disagrees.

"It's a breach of trust of the generous donors who gave that ground to the city for the use and enjoyment of open and green space," said retired Common Pleas Judge Alex Bonavitacola, who voted against leasing the land. "All the parks in the city are in jeopardy," he added. "If they can sell off a part of Burholme Park, they can sell off any part of the city. It's easy to make a concrete jungle, but it's pretty hard to find new parkland."

For their part, Fox Chase officials say they desperately need a new hospital. "Our facilities are really bursting at the seams," said spokesman Franklin Hoke. He said that the center treats about 7,500 new patients each year, and that 10 years from now that figure will jump to 12,000. "It's a climbing curve, and that kind of growth needs new facilities," Hoke said. "We need to grow to pursue cancer-research programs." Al Taubenberger, the former Republican mayoral candidate who is president of both the Northeast Chamber of Commerce and the Burholme Civic Association, testified in favor of the hospital expansion.
He said he had testified as head of the chamber only, and not on behalf of the civic association, because he didn't want to see "neighbors divided against neighbors." Some of those neighbors don't want to lose the park, but others see the cancer center as a benefit both as a hospital and a source of jobs, he said. The center anticipates that its expansion would create 4,000 jobs over the next 20 years. Hoke, the Fox Chase spokesman, said the center is looking for a site in Delaware, where a newspaper reported in September that the center wants to use part of a state park for a multimillion-dollar building. But Hoke said Fox Chase is committed to maintaining a presence at its current location.

Meanwhile, Gavin, a cancer survivor, said she understands Fox Chase's need to expand but questions its planned use of the park. "Why would they want to take something that's good for one's health, not just physically but mentally as well?" she asked. "People go there to find calm. That's what green land does for you."


The BATTLE IS ON!
Logged
Mmmmmmmm, post ride beers
fishnchips
Platinum Member
Addict
****
Posts: 815



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2008, 05:24:37 PM »
There are still vast sections of Philadelphia that suffer complete urban and industrial decay. There are entire factories, right downtown, that are dilapidated, not to mention numerous neighborhoods suffering 3rd-world blight. Fox Chase is more than a location, so there is no reason they can't set up a sister or satellite hospital in many other areas that are already within the concrete jungle. It would be a horrendous mistake to steal such a priceless commodity from the community.
Logged
Kelly
Lust4singletrack
The trail/ tool guy
PMBA Moderator
Jedi
*****
Posts: 1315


Keep trails friendly. Go by slow and say "Hello"

tgunz75@aol.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2008, 06:02:30 PM »
Yea I totally agree Jess. There are so many areas in the city that need to be revitalized. This revitalization would not only give them what they need, and create the new jobs, it would bring new life to areas that are already urban and in need of new life.

It's a no-brainer. Build it someplace else.
Logged
"Trails help humans make sense of a world increasingly dominated by pavement. They allow us to come more closely in touch with our natural surroundings, to soothe our psyches, to challenge our bodies, and to practice ancient skills"
epic rider
Platinum Member
Newbie
****
Posts: 36



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2008, 06:36:47 PM »
grew up 2 minutes form the park, went there sledding when it did snow around here,
as kids we rode in the back of the park not great trails just fun for a kid,

amazing that Ryers leaves the ground in his will to used as a park and the city sells/leases the ground
right out from under the people who use it ( baseball, soccer, golf driving range) .

they killed another open space in the city , when they could of knocked down blocks of abandon homes
that the city has tons of.
Logged
It's good for the body, good for the soul---Ned Overend
Kman
PMBA Moderator
Addict
*****
Posts: 560



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2008, 12:27:18 PM »
I wouldnt be surprised to see the city sqandering the Fairmount Park land to make a buck, they are already scumming up our image with approvals for gambling, as if thats what we really need, how is that going to improve the city. Philly is  hurting for money and land is a strong resourse.

 

:K

 
« Last Edit: November 28, 2008, 12:44:40 PM by Kman » Logged
We ride one speed.  Full!
jomissa
Platinum Member
Expert
****
Posts: 155



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2008, 12:33:10 PM »
i voted no with a clean conscience.  this is exactly why.
Logged
mtrostle
Platinum Member
Expert
****
Posts: 254



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2008, 10:33:29 AM »
Ruling released this moring:

Judge says no to Fox Chase
By Linda Loyd

INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

A Philadelphia judge today said no to giving city parkland for an expansion of Fox Chase Cancer Center, saying it would be wrong to break the will of the man who donated the land 100 years ago.
Judge John W. Herron of Philadelphia Orphans Court ruled, in a contentious three-year-old case, that Fox Chase's bid for a long-term lease of 19.5 acres on the 69-acre Burholme Park could not happen.

In a 61-page opinion, Herron wrote:

"This court concludes that the public trust doctrine protects every square foot of Ryerss' gift, which must remain as a public park until it ceases to be a viable and active park.

"This rule of law does not recognize any exception based on the valid needs of Fox Chase to expand or the city's salutary goal of protecting an increasing tax revenue obtained through the hospital's expansion. In these times of economic stress, it is understandable that states and cities facing severe budget crises will slash park spending, curtail the creation of new parks and even consider leasing or selling such land.

One hundred years of decisional law simply does not recognize such pressures as a raison d'etre for eviscerating our heritage to future generations and our need for recreational space for our inner-city youth and adult population, many of whom have chosen to live, work, and invest in the city, in part because of the rich environment offered by our public parklands and open spaces."

The last sentence of the opinion read:

"For all the reasons stated, the petition to lease 19.4 acres of Burholme Park to Fox Chase is denied."

The waiting room of Orphans Court was crowded with more than two dozen residents awaiting this morning's opinion, along with a member of each side's legal team. And after the ruling was issued, some of those residents went out into the hallway to loudly express their joy.

Herron ruled against the wishes of powerful politicians, including Mayor Nutter and Mayor Street before him. The Fairmount Park Commission in March 2005 voted, 11-2, to lease active parkland. Councilman Brian J. O'Neill also supports the expansion, which is in his 10th District.

Fox Chase said it needs to expand into Burholme Park in Northeast Philadelphia to keep pace with cancer care and research and the increasing number of patients. But it has said it would look elsewhere, if the city says no. It is considering a second campus, in Delaware.

Herron and the Orphans Court were asked by the city to break the will of philanthropist Robert Waln Ryerss, who in 1895 donated his farm and mansion as a park for "the use and enjoyment of the people forever."

In 1905, upon the death of Ryerss' widow, Mary, City Solicitor George Wharton Pepper advised that the park commission was to protect Burholme Park in perpetuity for citizens of Philadelphia.

A group of residents who live near the park, plus a Ryerss descendant who lives in Florida, filed a lawsuit to stop the park commission from giving any portion of the park to Fox Chase. They argued that the city did not fully consider the effect of losing parkland, or try hard enough to find other land for Fox Chase.

After City Council voted to lease the land to Fox Chase last March, the city asked the Orphans Court to break the will. Residents then filed in August to intervene in the case. Herron granted them standing as parties to the case; those residents say that's important because, if they lose, they have a right to appeal.

In March 2005, two Fairmount Park commissioners, E. Harris Baum and Phillip Price, both lawyers, voted against leasing part of the park to the hospital; the vote was 11-2. Baum noted that the commission did not seek a formal opinion from the City Solicitor's office before the vote.

Price said it was the first time in the park commission's 150 years that parkland was transferred against someone's stated wishes in a will.

"To me, it is a very clear issue," he said. "Our mission as a park commission is to protect and preserve parkland. This will made a gift of parkland for the benefit of the citizens forever. Both City Council and the city solicitor, at the time, expressly affirmed that will."

Ryerss also established an endowment to maintain the parkland and the house, which is a museum and library, Price said. "I see no reason to change it."

Fox Chase plans an $800 million to $1 billion expansion that would take 20 to 25 years and create more than 4,000 jobs, Fox Chase supporters said.

Fox Chase agreed to pay the city up to $8.25 million during phases of construction, which include the addition of 15 new buildings. In addition, $4 million is earmarked for O'Neill's district, which O'Neill has said would be used to purchase open space to replace some of the 19.4 Burholme Park acres sacrificed in the process.

Lawyer Samuel Stretton, representing a group of neighbors, argued that leasing parkland is unprecedented and goes against both Ryerss' will and Fairmount Park's public trust.

The legal process required to give Fox Chase use of the parkland is similar to what the Barnes Foundation was engaged in for several years in trying to move its art collection from Merion to Philadelphia. A ruling in Montgomery County Orphans' Court cleared the way for that move.


Logged
Keep the rubber side down.........
Dmitri
Platinum Member
Addict
****
Posts: 900


dzorine
View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2008, 11:08:54 AM »
One thing I don't get is why Fox Chase center cannot expend vertically, building up taller structure for expansion?...

I'm sure I'm simplifying the issue, but if they are that desperate for space, and are willing to invest the millions, why not try to do it in place and just go up?  Huh

dz
Logged
I crash therefore I am!
Lust4singletrack
The trail/ tool guy
PMBA Moderator
Jedi
*****
Posts: 1315


Keep trails friendly. Go by slow and say "Hello"

tgunz75@aol.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2008, 11:31:38 AM »
Because the footers on the building cannot withstand more up.
Logged
"Trails help humans make sense of a world increasingly dominated by pavement. They allow us to come more closely in touch with our natural surroundings, to soothe our psyches, to challenge our bodies, and to practice ancient skills"
Dmitri
Platinum Member
Addict
****
Posts: 900


dzorine
View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2008, 11:45:33 AM »
Sure, but to continue playing devil's advocate, if it was that desperate, they have free space/multiply buildings, including multi-story garage as well as parking lots, where they could build new taller buildings, move existing facilities to those, knock the existing building down and re-build with stronger footers, and taller.

Not like it's not being done on the daily basis in places like NYC, where they expend vertically "in place" on top of existing footprint...

Anyway, we are getting sidetracked. I'm glad that the judge shut it down. It's a very good precident! Especially when the city goes after selling other park space, the residents could follow this case and do the same to stop them!

dz
Logged
I crash therefore I am!
Chuck U
Platinum Member
Expert
****
Posts: 274


ChuckUni
View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2008, 12:02:17 PM »
Because rebuilding higher is more expensive and probably difficult.   Destroying park land is cheap and easy, so long as no one stands in the way.

Good for the judge!
Logged
fishnchips
Platinum Member
Addict
****
Posts: 815



View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2008, 12:04:35 PM »

Quote
Herron ruled against the wishes of powerful politicians, including Mayor Nutter and Mayor Street before him. The Fairmount Park Commission in March 2005 voted, 11-2, to lease active parkland. Councilman Brian J. O'Neill also supports the expansion, which is in his 10th District.

This is what I find scary, that all most of the commissioners and folks in charge are all for selling off park land. There's only two commissioners who saw a problem with this?
Logged
Kelly
Chuck U
Platinum Member
Expert
****
Posts: 274


ChuckUni
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2008, 12:12:04 PM »
This is what I find scary, that all most of the commissioners and folks in charge are all for selling off park land. There's only two commissioners who saw a problem with this?

Need to check and see what exotic vacations all the others went on recently!
Logged
epic rider
Platinum Member
Newbie
****
Posts: 36



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2008, 04:50:43 PM »
[which O'Neill has said would be used to purchase open space to replace some of the 19.4 Burholme Park acres sacrificed in the process.]

O'Neill is a tool, as one who was born and raised in fox chase the only  open land would be
Fox Chase farm & Pennypack Park, and I'm sure they will find a way to sell that off  one day soon
Logged
It's good for the body, good for the soul---Ned Overend
Chuck U
Platinum Member
Expert
****
Posts: 274


ChuckUni
View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2008, 05:02:19 PM »
I wonder if Brian J O'Neill the councilman has any relation to J. Brian O'Neill, founder of O'Neill properties...who are a "real estate development company specializing in identifying and acquiring abandoned or underutilized industrial sites"

also, the developer of the apartment complexes in Conshi that went up in major flames earlier this year.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2008, 05:08:42 PM by Chuck U » Logged
dirtmerchant
PMBA Moderator
Addict
*****
Posts: 989



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2008, 10:36:04 PM »
mtrostle thanks a lot for the update, and the great news! Unfortunately I heard on NPR today that Fox Chase is going to appeal the decision. Who is in charge of this for them?!?! Does the CEO know whats happening? We gotta contact that guy and ask him what the hell he is thinking??!  Huh 

I would say I will never solicit Fox Chase but I guess noone wants to. It all comes down to $$$$. I lost some respect for Nutter. I bet Fox Chase made a nice contributuon to his campaign...

It's all bullshit but I am glad that Judge has some balls!!!!!! John W. Herron  for PRESIDENT!
Logged
Mmmmmmmm, post ride beers
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
© 2009 The Philadelphia Mountain Biking Association
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.